![]() ![]() A majority of data sets showed differences between transformed and nontransformed data in mean separations determined using LSD (0.05), although most of these differences were minor and had little effect on interpretation of results. The arcsine transformation, not generally recommended for data sets having values from 0 to 20% or 80 to 100%, was as effective in correcting non-normality, heterogeneity of variance, and nonadditivity in these data sets as was the recommended square root transformation. R arcsine transformation Claire Sheller Wed, 14:04:28 -0700 I have been trying to preform both a bartlett's test and an arcsine transformation on some average percentage data. Performing the recommended transformation in conjunction with omitting treatments having identical replicate observations provided a high percentage of correction of non-normality, heterogeneity of variance, and nonadditivity. ![]() Transformations appeared to correct deficiencies in these three parameters in the majority of data sets, but had adverse effects in certain other data sets. The arcsine transformation took care of the error distribution, while the probit. The arcsine and square root transformations were tested on 82 weed control data sets and 62 winter wheat winter survival data sets to determine effects on normality of the error terms, homogeneity of variance, and additivity of the model. The traditional transformations of proportion data were arcsine and probit. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |